• Q : Audit of tyco-legal responsibility to shareholders....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Price water house Coopers and the audit of Tyco: legal responsibility to shareholders? In debating the following, please make sure to cite any sources used and where they are used.

  • Q : Issuing shares of common stock....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Following transactions occurred during 2005: 1) Acquired machine with cost of $225,000 by issuing shares of common stock 2) Bonds, with $500,000 of face value and 10 years till maturity, were issued a

  • Q : Controversial issues concerning workplace rights....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Question 1. What are the employee workplace rights mandated by U.S. Federal law? Question 2. Briefly discuss at least two controversial issues concerning workplace rights (other than monitoring email)

  • Q : How the womens rights came into existence....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Aquinas' statement is also somewhat complicated. Using the example of no voting rights for women, we could conclude that this is how the women's rights came into existence.

  • Q : Agreement during the determination of laws....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Aquina thinks that there should be a shared agreement during the determination of laws. His statement is not very clear but it is progressive.

  • Q : Partnership and a limited partnership problem....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Question. Define "employment at will". Question. Explain the difference between a partnership and a limited partnership.

  • Q : Negotiating a contract with its employees....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    A manufacturing company is negotiating a contract with its employees. The probability that the union will go on strike is 5%. If the union goes on strike, the company estimates that it loose $345,00

  • Q : Do private sector affirmative action plans violate title vii....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Temporary, voluntary, private sector affirmative action plans designed to eliminate conspicuous racial imbalance in traditionally segregated job categories that do not unnecessarily trammel the inte

  • Q : Case study-doower versus gotham....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    So Eval needs to prove Negligent infliction of emotional distress or Iintentional infliction of Emotional Distress caused simply by having Doberman's there to frighten Eval or any intruder.

  • Q : Violating the lanham trademark act....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    The last time I was in Nogales I was offered a $10 "Rolex" watch. Was the seller violating the Lanham Trademark Act? Is there any possibility a consumer paying $10 for a "Rolex" could be confused ab

  • Q : Breach of the brokerage contract....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    During the term of such a contract the owner may withdraw any power the owner has given the broker to contract with a third party in the owner's name, but this is not a revocation of the contract be

  • Q : Customer refused to accept delivery....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Raffles (the broker) and Wichelhaus (the customer) didn't actually agree on a specific arrival date. So why do you think the court found in favor of the customer? Why do you think the customer refus

  • Q : Contracts and imposes obligations on the parties....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    In the above four examples, the parties reached agreements. In the next two, the parties did not reach agreements. Nevertheless, the law treats the following situations as if they were contracts - "

  • Q : Case scenario of faragher versus city of boca raton....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    I have tried the websites I listed below. My problem is I can't seem to minimize the Case Analysis with the Facts, Issue, Holding and Summary of the Court's Reasoning.

  • Q : Non-contract liability-promissory estoppel....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    If the company's letter had been correct, the policyholder could have purchased coverage for another year. This "non-contract" liability is called promissory estoppel.

  • Q : Valid-void-voidable and unenforceable contracts....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Question 1. What is the difference between valid, void, voidable and unenforceable contracts?

  • Q : Public nuisance and private nuisance....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Question: Compare and Contrast the following concepts: 1) Assault and battery 2) Public nuisance and private nuisance 3) Intentional tort and negligence

  • Q : Different aspects of your start-up business....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    You have examined several different aspects of your start-up business. Identify what forces in the external environment (competition, political/legal, economic, technological, and social/cultural) w

  • Q : Warranties that apply to grocery business....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Question. Discuss the different warranties that apply to Grocery's business. Explain your answer in detail.

  • Q : Binding and nonbinding promises....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Compare and contrast the following concepts: - Binding and nonbinding promises - Bilateral and unilateral contracts

  • Q : Law and implications to an organization....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Question: What are the corrolations? Question: Please find current interpretations of the law and implications to an organization?

  • Q : Negotiate a contract to purchase some property....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Andrew hires Patricia, an attorney, to negotiate a contract to purchase some property. He agrees to pay her $75 an hour for her services, and she agrees to use her own office and secretarial staff t

  • Q : Best defenses for powermax and diy warehouse....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Harry sued PowerMax and DIY Warehouse to recover for his injuries, citing the Uniform Commercial Code. What are Harry's best arguments? What are the best defenses for PowerMax and DIY Warehouse? Wha

  • Q : Corporate veil remained intact....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Perhaps from a desire to protect this engine of economic growth and prosperity, the court decided that Seon, not Carlton, was responsible for Walkovsky's injuries and dismissed the complaint against

  • Q : President clintons health reform proposal of 1993....
    Business Law and Ethics :

    Analyze and discuss President Clinton's Health Reform Proposal of 1993 using the terms of this metaphor. Apply your critical thinking skills to assess the events surrounding this proposal as objecti

©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.