Start Discovering Solved Questions and Your Course Assignments
TextBooks Included
Active Tutors
Asked Questions
Answered Questions
illegality - law of contracttherefore an agreement to constitute a legally enforceable contract then it must have been entered into to a lawful
contracts of guaranteethere the law of contract act 1961 s3 1 provides as followactually no suit shall be brought whereby to charge the defendant
transfer of immovable propertyby s54 property act 1882 as note this act is applicable in the us requires that a transfer of immovable property worth
representations regarding character or creditsince statements relating to a persons credit-worthiness will only be actionable whether made in
negotiable instruments - law of contracthowever past services may constitute valuable consideration to a bill of exchange under by s27 of the bills
exceptions to the doctrine of privity of contractfurther there are a number of exceptions to the privity of contract rule of which the subsequent may
consideration must move from the promise - law of contractconversely the rule that consideration must move from the promisee means such only a person
adequacy of consideration - law of contractwell provided that consideration is sufficient or actual it necessitate not be adequate hence the
illustrtaion of rules relating to considerationfoakes v beer 1884actually on the date 11th of august 1875 mrs beer wrapped judgment next to dr foakes
executed consideration - types of considerationactually executed consideration is constituted through something done by the plaintiff because to a
executory consideration - types of considerationalthough executory consideration consists of a promise made about one party and a promise made
consideration - element of contractjust to an agreement to constitute a contract the common law of the england then adopted in the us requires such
detriment as consideration an example of a detriment that will legally suffice like the consideration for a promise is provided with the case of
contractual capacity of corporationshowever the courts have developed known as the doctrine to ultra vires in order for determines the contractual
contractual capacity of persons of unsound mindfurthermore a contract entered into through a person of unsound mind is voidable on his option whether
important points - contractual capacity of drunken personshere the following points should be notice for as ratificationwell a drunken man who enters
contractual capacity of drunken personswhether a person purported to enter with a contract at a time at what time he was too drunk to understand then
subrogation - void contracts however in re national permanent benefit building society would the court stated that where an infant
loans given for necessaries - void contracts it may happen that an infant asks someone to a loan for buy necessaries like school
loans - void contractshowever all loans made for an infant are void and irrevocable since in leslie ltd v sheill the infant defendant had
void contracts - law of contractwhereas the infants relief act 1874 of the uk applies to the us as a statute of general application such was in
purchase of shares - voidable contractshowever an infant who applies to is allotted a companys shares becomes a member to the company under s28 2 for
partnership agreement - voidable contractsconversely an infant is bound at common law through a partnership agreement although he is free to
leases - voidable contractshowever a lease granted to an infant is binding on him unless he repudiates it then within a reasonable time after
beneficial service - binding contractsaccording to such a contract relates service or apprenticeship is such binding on an infant - which mostly