Problem: In Weeks One through Two of our course, we engaged and closely considered two important critiques of the study of comparative politics. The first critique, exemplified by Robert Marks, is that the study of comparative politics is Eurocentric. The second critique, exemplified by James C. Scott, is that the study of comparative politics is state-centric. clearly explain throughout the body of your essay if you believe the study of comparative politics should be Eurocentric or not, and if it should be State-centric or not. Your argument should critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of the two above critiques, and draw on the material we have covered in weeks 1 through 2 of class to provide reasons for the positions you take.