Problem: When we discussed the harm principle, we talked about several difficult questions. One question had to do with what counts as a harm in (the relevant sense), and another question had to do with what counts as causing a harm (in the relevant sense). Which of the following is a case in which there is a clear harm but it is not clear whether the action causes harm (in the relevant sense)? Group of answer choices Pamela convinces several people that jokes are bad for a person's character, and they follow her advice and live a very serious and less pleasure-filled lifestyle. Anna kills sixteen innocent people in cold blood for her own personal gain. Karen convinces several people to stop smoking and they live a longer and happier life as a result. A number of people endure severe pain and suffering because Clarissa enforces patent rights and refuses to sell her company's new pain medicine at a price that they can afford.