(a) Briefly summarise the facts and legal arguments in this case and describe the decisions reached in the lower courts. (note that the facts can be found in the opinions of Lord Jauncey and Lord Lowry)
(b) What was the decision reached by the House of Lords and did all the judges agree?
(c) With reference to relevant case law, explain briefly how the doctrine of precedent operates in the English legal system, and the extent to which it permits judicial law making.
(d) In his opinion, Lord Jauncey referred to 3 previous cases which were heard in the House of Lords and Privy Council to see if they would
provide any guidance. What were these cases and what was their significance to the current case in the context of the doctrine of binding
precedent?