Problem: Does the conclusion offer well-stated (but succinct) reasoning why your position is helpful to everyone-or even a possible compromise?
Perhaps a compromise that could work for both sides would be the instatement of red flag laws with heavy checks and balances in place. This can mean a high standard of proof to be presented, for instance, a testimony by mental health professionals, coupled with ensuring a fair hearing for those who are suspected of being a danger either to themselves or others. These as included, can serve to address the concerns of those who oppose red flag laws without depriving us of the necessary actions being taken in the prevention of gun violence. In conclusion, to enhance public safety while recognizing personal rights, passing red flag laws with such safeguards can go a long way towards providing a much more weighted approach. Red flag laws should be able to block misuse and protect constitutional freedoms, if guaranteeing due process and requiring substantial evidence. This will please a carefully weighted perspective on both sides and provide a safer society for all.