Problem: Respond to this discussion "When selecting judges, I believe nonpartisan elections are the best method. Here's why: I think nonpartisan elections emphasize the importance of judicial impartiality and independence. Removing political party affiliations from the ballot ensures that judges are chosen based on their qualifications, experience, and commitment to justice rather than their political connections or party loyalty. This nurtures a more unbiased judiciary, which is essential for maintaining public trust and confidence in our legal system. Moreover, nonpartisan elections empower voters to make more informed decisions. While some may argue that removing party affiliations from the ballot could lead to a lack of transparency, we need to note that voters are encouraged to research the candidates' backgrounds, qualifications, and judicial philosophies. This promotes a more engaged and educated electorate, which ultimately leads to the selection of more competent and fair-minded judges. Additionally, nonpartisan elections significantly reduce the influence of political money in judicial races. Without the need to appeal to party donors, candidates can focus on demonstrating their judicial capabilities and integrity. This helps safeguard the independence of judges, ensuring that they are not beholden to special interests or political pressures, and instilling confidence in the public about the judges' ability to make fair and just decisions."