Show Me My Money (Reisenfeld & Company v. The Network Group Inc., p. 313)
Why does the court see this case as involving a quasi-contract as opposed to an actual contract?
What other case law does the court rely on in finding precedent/support for compensating Reisenfeld?
Does this decision appear to follow the golden rule guideline set forth in Chapter 2 (pp. 27 and 28)?
Describe another example of an implied-in-fact or quasi-contract that you have experienced or is mentioned in the text.