Who should have warned barker of the dangers of working


Case: Barker v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.,

Case Questions

1. Who should have warned Barker of the dangers of working with asbestos?

2. A dissenting opinion was written, saying that the case should have gone to a jury because Hennessy knew that its machines and lathes could be used only with dangerous asbestos-related products. Do you agree or disagree with the dissent? Why?

3. What would have to be proved for a defense of assumption of risk to be effective had this gone to trial?

4. FS'OM an ethical perspective, do you agree or dis¬agree with the court's decision? Explain.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Who should have warned barker of the dangers of working
Reference No:- TGS01040910

Expected delivery within 24 Hours