Discussion Post
Garrett Hardin and Peter Singer offer dramatically different views on the obligation of nations and individuals to intervene to alleviate world hunger and poverty. While each author offers numerous arguments to bolster their respective points of view, in general, which author's position to do you find most appealing? Explain why. Is there a middle ground that might be derived from insights provided in each author's position?
The response must include a reference list. One-inch margins, double-space, Using Times New Roman 12 pnt font and APA style of writing and citations.