Problem: Where does the perception of Buddhism as a religion free from violence come from? What makes the idea so persistent? Some people might say the Myanma monk Wirathu-and other Buddhist monks who promote violence-are not "real" Buddhists. Why might it be problematic for college students in North America to make judgments about whether people in Myanmar are practicing Buddhism "correctly" or not? Please respond in approximately one paragraph, and engage explicitly with Hannah Beech's text in The Religion Matters Reader at least once in your answer.