When would smos have an advantage in being formal


Discussion Post

• Discuss the ways in which Social Movement Organizations (SMOs) differ from each other.

• When would SMOs have an advantage in being formal, and when informal? When hierarchical, and when egalitarian?

• In what ways is transnational or cross-border organizing easier than it might have been, say, 100 years ago? What are some of the difficulties involved in organizing a transnational movement?

The response should include a reference list. One-inch margins, Using Times New Roman 12 pnt font, double-space and APA style of writing and citations.

Textbook: Goodwin, Jeff, Jasper, J. M. (2015). The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, 3rd Edition, Malden, MA, Wiley Blackwell.

a) Read Goodwin & Jasper: Introduction Part V "How Are Movements Organized," pp. 155-158
b) Chapter 16 "Social Movement Organizations" by J. McCarthy and M. Zald pp. 159-174
c) Chapter 17 "Transnational Environmental Activism" by Paul Wapner pp. 175-183
d) Chapter 18 "The Transnational Network for Democratic Globalization" by Jackie Smith pp 184-197.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Other Subject: When would smos have an advantage in being formal
Reference No:- TGS03152767

Now Priced at $20 (50% Discount)

Recommended (95%)

Rated (4.7/5)