When jampk sued parrish and chla r son argued that the fact


Parrish and Chlarson worked for J&K Computer Systems, Inc. Parrish was a computer programmer, and Chlarson was a trainee. In his capacity as programmer, Parrish wrote an accounts receivable program.

Customers of J&K were granted licenses to use the program. A label on the program noted that it was J&K's property and that it could not be used without authorization under a li censing agreement. Parrish, Chlarson , and all other J&K employees were informed that the program was a secret.

Nevertheless, Parrish copied it, left J&K's employ, and, along with Chlarson , opened a business similar to J&K. Parrish and Chlarson then sold the copied program to various customers.

When J&K sued, Parrish and Chla r son argued that the fact that J&K had revealed the program to their customers meant it was no longer a trade secret. Were Parrish and Chlarson correct?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Management Theories: When jampk sued parrish and chla r son argued that the fact
Reference No:- TGS02176379

Expected delivery within 24 Hours