Discussion Post
For this discussion, think through working with family violence or families in crisis, choose two of the below questions to answer in addition to answering the last question below:
1) How can therapists balance a relativistic world view with values about human safety and the right to self-determination and protection?
2) When is the clinical utility of neutrality limited or counterproductive?
3) When are convictions essential to the change process?
4) How does one confront a batterer about his destructive behavior without condemning him?
5) How can therapists employ their values to therapeutic advantage while maintaining a caring and respectful connection with family members who are struggling with the trauma of violence?
6) How does Christian ministry naturally fit when working with a family in crisis?
The response should include a reference list. Double-space, using Times New Roman 12 pnt font, one-inch margins, and APA style of writing and citations.