What were the two main findings in the parc case and why is


Directions:

Student is to respond to the following questions on Exceptional Student Education.?The following questions are designed to give you a basic understanding of the law and regulations governing Exceptional Education in public schools.

Title Page then type each question and provide answers for the following:

1) What were the two main findings in the PARC Case (1971)?

2) Identify by exceptionality the students who were eligible for Exceptional Student Education under the provisions of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (94-142) passed in 1975?

3) Do the parents have to pay for the education if their disabled child attends a public school?

4) Why is a regular education teacher included in the IEP (Individual Education Plan) team?

5) Define the term, "appropriate education."

6) Define the term, "Individual Education Plan or IEP."

7) What did the U.S. Supreme Court decide in the Rowley Case?

8) What did the U.S. Supreme Court decide the school had to provide in the Tatro Case?

9) In Cedar Rapids v. Garret, The U.S. Supreme Court decided that the school had to do what for the student?

10) What was the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Honig v. Doe?

11) Explain when a school must hold a "manifestation determination hearing?"

12) Explain when a school must develop a "behavior intervention plan (BIP) for a student?

13) What is the definition of a "least restrictive environment" or LRE?

14) What is the definition of "related services?"

15) What did the U.S. Supreme Court decide in Schaeffer v. Weast (2005)?

16) What does the term: "Response To Intervention" (RTI) mean for public school principals and teachers?

17) What did the U.S. Supreme Court decide in Winkelman v. Parma City School District (2007)?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: What were the two main findings in the parc case and why is
Reference No:- TGS01034565

Expected delivery within 24 Hours