What were the strengths and weaknesses of each of the change


Problem

I. Fixing Capitalism

Some Sociologists believe that capitalism simply needs to be fixed, and that a free-market economy is here to stay. For example, countries may need to adopt a welfare capitalist economy that provides welfare services such as free education and health care. Sociologists may also advocate for green (environmentally friendly) capitalism. Other Sociologists argue this won't fix the problem of rich people exploiting the poor.

II. Global Welfare

Some Sociologists believe in enforcing a form of global governance. The United Nations, or an intergovernmental organization used for international cooperation and order, attempts to maintain order by watching over numerous countries. But is it wise to have a global government? Should they be able to use technology for surveillance? Who controls the United Nations? To date, the UN does not have full authority over any country. They can only aid.

III. Radical Change

Some Sociologists, like Robin Kelley and Mihailo Markovic, believe that radical social change was the answer. We would have to made new society that has never been created before. Radical social change for Kelley and But can we change a whole system? And what Mihailo means we would have to break it would a post-capitalist society look like? How all down, not necessarily just control or would your ideal society look? Tsing's The reform what we already have... a tall task Mushroom at the End of the World looks at indeed considering that capitalism quickly what a post-capitalist world might look like. changes and adapts over time.

Task

a) What were the strengths and weaknesses of each of the potential solutions/changes?
b) Which one do you think is the best? What other solutions/changes can be made?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: What were the strengths and weaknesses of each of the change
Reference No:- TGS03270148

Expected delivery within 24 Hours