Discussion Post
Study the case of Malden Mills and Aaron Feuerstein. With Malden Mills, we have the luxury of hindsight, knowing how Aaron Feuerstein's gamble paid off---striving to protect his employees but going into bankruptcy. Was he right; that is, was his decision-making sound? Knowing what you know, how would you have advised him?
Create a discussion of not more than a page and should be answering the below questions in your response.
o What was the problem being faced?
o What personal values do you associate with this case?
o Who are the stakeholders and what issues were the stakeholders facing?
o How did Mr. Feuerstein's ethical principles impact the outcome and how did the risks relate to the benefits?
o What were the legal consequences?
o What are other possible outcomes and would those other possible outcomes have been justified?
The response must include a reference list. Using one-inch margins, double-space, Times New Roman 12 pnt font and APA style of writing and citations.