Problem
The Midnight Journal Entry, HBS Case NA0180
a) What was the "midnight journal entry" referred to in the title of the case? If you were Okumoto, would you consider the midnight journal entry to be an ethical issue? Or not?
b) Was the decision (made by Dooley and others) to reverse the Asian benefits accrual ("the midnight journal entry") ethical? Why or why not?
c) At the point at which the case ends, should Okumoto drop the matter or continue to act on his concerns?