Question: Case Analysis Question. Go to Appendix G at the end of this text and examine Case No. 4 [Wilson Fertilizer & Grain, Inc. v. ADM Milling Co., 654 N.E.2d 848 (Ind.App. 1995)]. This case has been excerpted there in great detail. Review and then brief the case, making sure that your brief answers the following questions.
1 What was the issue that the Indiana state intermediate appellate court was asked to decide in this case?
2 Did the court rule in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant? Why?
3 What was the dissent's view on the central issue in this case?
4 Why does it matter whether the arbitration clause in ADM's confirmation "materially altered" the contract with Wilson? 5 How does a court determine when an additional term in acceptance "materially alters" the contract?