Problem: Zubulake v UBS Warburg
1) What was the legal issue in this case? (background)
2) What factors did this Judge use in cost-burden analysis of E-discovery? Explain how they were applied in this case.
3) Did this change from the factors in the Rowe Entertainment decision? If so, how and why?
4) What discovery did UBS fail to produce or preserve? (Be Descriptive
5) What was the content of the adverse inference given by the judge to the jury?
6) What did the Judge tell the lawyers regarding their responsibility in getting their clients to produce e-discovery?