Question:
What was the court's ANALYSIS (legal reasoning) in the Neumann v Liles case? (Choose ALL the correct answers) Multiple select question. Hyperbolic expressions negate any impression that Liles was asserting objective facts. Throughout his review, Liles ascribed to Neumann conduct that is incompatible with the proper conduct of a wedding venue operator The title of the review -"Disaster" - and "worst wedding experience" followed by a series of exclamation marks is hyperbolic and sets the tone The statement "[i]n my opinion [s]he will find a [way] to keep your $500 deposit" is a provable fact, and not opinion