Problem:
Does your viewpoint align more with Bill's case study from Diller (2008), a guy who walks into a hospital who is not culturally Competent (who advocates for preserving the kid over absorbing parental views), or Sukey's (who values the soul above life), given those cultural and spiritual beliefs might impact medical treatment for a child? Why would you rank one over the other?
Fadiman, A. (1997). The spirit catches you. Diversity falls. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux (ISBN-13: p. 978-0374533403)