What sort of ethical issues are present


Grainiacs, Inc. is a diversified commodity merchandising company located in the upper mid-west with fiscal operations conducted on a calendar-year basis. The company primarily buys and sells corn and soybeans and operates multiple storage facilities in several states. Each storage location is individually registered as a Licensed Federal Warehouse with US Department of Agriculture. This licensing allows each facility to legally sell all or a portion its physical grain inventory for cash, effectively shifting ownership of those particular stocks to the purchasing company while maintaining physical control of the assets (hence becoming consigned inventory belonging to the purchaser). Each sale is consummated at arms-length. That is, the purchaser gives Grainiacs cash equal to the value of the grain purchased and Grainiacs in-turn gives the purchaser a Federal Warehouse Receipt, a federally issued negotiable instrument representing ownership of the inventory. At this point, Grainiacs will record as sale of the inventory, and will no longer formally recognize the inventory on its financial statements, but is required by law to maintain a report showing owned and non-owned inventory located at the facility. In addition, the facility cannot allow total physical stocks to fall below the amount owned by the purchaser until it is shipped to the purchaser. Once the purchaser receives all the grain, the Warehouse Receipt is cancelled and returned to Grainiacs. The entire transaction is supported by a formal written sales/purchase contract outlining all specifics of the trade including quality and volume amounts and pricing conditions.

At the beginning of the year, the Grainiacs senior executive responsible for storage facility operations was assigned the goal of reducing the carrying value of inventory by 20%. As an incentive, the goal was tied to a performance bonus of 15% of the executives' annual salary (a bonus amounting to over $35,000); therefore, meeting the goal would prove to very lucrative to the executive. As of the middle of December, the goal had not been achieved, falling short by around $60 Million. Realizing that the goal might not be realized, the executive devised a plan and entered into a verbal agreement with another grain merchandiser that on December 30th, Grainiacs would sell $70 Million of existing inventory (located at several locations) for cash and issue Warehouse Receipts (one from each facility affected), all supported by binding written contracts in accordance with legal requirements. This would effectively reduce the inventory on Grainiacs December 31st Balance Sheet to the desired goal (even though the inventory would physically remain in place), and allow the executive to earn the bonus. Then, on January 2nd, Grainiacs would repurchase the inventory at the original selling price plus a premium equal to 1% of the original selling price ($700,000). Once the repurchase was executed, the issued Warehouse Receipts would be cancelled and the inventory would be reinstated to Grainiacs' financial statements at the new, higher value.

Required:

Analyze the executive's plan of action. In particular, is the plan in accordance with GAAP or even legal? Can the inventory be recorded at the new price that is 1% higher? What sort of ethical issues are present?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Accounting Basics: What sort of ethical issues are present
Reference No:- TGS0697419

Expected delivery within 24 Hours