Question: What RULE (law) did the court use in the Stahlecker v Ford Motor Co case? (Choose TWO correct answers) Multiple select question. The criminal act of a third person is a superseding cause of harm to another unless there is a special relationship Ford and Firestone failed to exercise reasonable care in designing and manufacturing their tires and failed to warn their users Foreseeability and proximate cause must include the possibility of a tortious or criminal act Any intentional breach of this duty is the proximate cause of harm