Read the "Theory to Practice" case study:
Question 1: At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract(s)?
Question 2: What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties' objective intent to contract the distribution of the game?
Question 3: Does the fact that the parties were communicating by e-mail have any impact on the analysis in Questions 1 and 2 (above)?
Question 4: What role does the statute of frauds play in the contract to distribute the game?
Question 5: Could BTT avoid the contract to distribute the game under the doctrine of mistake?
Question 6: Assuming, arguendo, that this e-mail does constitute an agreement to distribute the game, what consideration supports this Agreement?