Problem
A. Maryanne has brought another complaint against a party (again). She thinks "this time it will work!" She brings a claim hoping that she will get a sympathetic member who hears her complaint although her complaint lacks any evidence to support her already weak claim. What provision of the SPPA would you utilize to best respond to this type of filing?
B. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, is significant to administrative law in that it:
a) Determines presumptive standard of review is "correctness" and reasonableness"
b) Determines the presumption that the standard of review will be reasonableness, unless there is clear legislative direction that a different standard was intended
c) Is a review and clarifying decision post Dunsmuir.