Problem
What case study is good, where the character of a victim of sexual assault was introduced in evidence by the accused to prove that the victim was not raped or assaulted due to her history of being prostitute?
a) Would this case be based on circumstantial evidence or direct evidence?
b) What items of evidence linked the accused to the sexual assault?
c) Should the victim's profession of being a prostitute be introduced in court, or is it a violation of the rape shield law?
d) Was the information influencing the jurors, and are less likely to convict?