Problem: According to Titchener, what is the proper subject matter for psychology? How does it differ from the subject matter of other sciences? After all, psychology was just following the scientific movement at the time, focusing on breaking things down into their component structures. But how was psychology different from those other fields? Some critics of structuralism, according to your text, felt that experience could not be fully understood by a study of its element. Discuss structuralism and these criticisms.