1). What is the main point of each article? (50- 100 words)
2). How does the author support his main claim? (50- 100 words)
3). Pojman page 130. Study/Review question # 1. (50 - 100 words)
How convincing is Hick's argument? Does it explain natural evil (what Hick calls non-moral evil; that is, disease, earthquakes, famines, and floods)? (50 - 100 words)
4). In relation to Gayatri Spivak: Can the Subaltern Speak (READ FIRST 15 PAGES ONLY)!!!!!!!!!
Reflect: How does Gayatri Spivak's writing on the sub-altern stand in relation to critique, or support Dostoevsky and Hick's writing on the problem of evil? (50 - 100 words)
Given below is the link of the two articles:
Article 1: John Hick- 11-29
Article 2: Spivak
https://www.dropbox.com/s/flypehrj3eqj9s4/Articles.rar?dl=0