Question: What is the main ISSUE (legal question) the court wants to answer in the Dynegy v Yates case? Multiple choice question. Does the statute of frauds suretyship provision require Olis to pay for his legal fees? Does the statute of frauds "main purpose" doctrine prevent Dynegy from answering for the debt of Olis? Whether the separate written fee agreement between Yatesand Olis is enforceable? Does the statute of frauds allow the payment of legal fees from an escrow account owned by Dynegy?