Question 1: What is the difference between being "in possession" of a firearm, "having with you" a firearm and "carrying" a firearm?
Question 2: Explain what Steyn LJ is saying at pg 53 left side, D-F. (See Bourne - to follow.)
Question 3: What is the literal meaning of "to have with him" a firearm?
Question 4: What does Steyn LJ explain is the purpose of the Firearms Act 1968?
Question 5: How does this purpose "colour" the meaning of the words "to have with him" a firearm?
Question 6: What did Steyn LJ explain must be considered when deciding whether a person "has with him" a firearm under s 18?
Question 7: What was the outcome of this part of the appellants' appeal?