What is the "demandingness objection" to consequentialism? Explain very briefly how this objection presents a challenge to consequentialism.
Explain one "uncompromising" and one "compromising" response to the objection.
What is the "integrity objection" to consequentialism? Explain very briefly how this objection presents a challenge to consequentialism.
What is the "repugnant conclusion"? How does Derek Parfit use this example to attempt to criticize consequentialism?