Assignment task:
He returned to the clinic and discovered he injected his male patient with a female hormone. The names of the medicine were very similar. The doctor decided to consult with his colleague, and the doctor was advised one injection will not affect his male patient. The doctor was still concerned and contacted his patient two days after his procedure. He requested the patient to return if the swelling continues. The patient returned to the doctor the following week. Although his swelling decreased, it was still evident. The doctor gave him the right injection this time and did not charge the patient for the visit. The doctor was too embarrassed to tell his mistake. The patient eventually made a full recovery. However, months have passed and the mistake is still documented on the chart. Respond to the following question? Define the ethical issue in this scenario? Should the doctor still tell his patient that he injected him with a female hormone? Explain the benefits of informing OR not informing the patient from 3 perspectives: 1. for the patient's sak 2. for the doctor's sake 3. for the sake of principle. Need Assignment Help?