What historical developments did federal government consider


Discussion Post: AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY

Part I

Answer each question separately and number your responses. Each question should be answered in 1 to 2 well-developed paragraphs. Please utilize and reference weekly materials in your responses. Reach out via email with any questions.

• What historical developments did the federal government consider to be justification for the passage and enforcement of the Espionage and Sedition Acts?

• Compare the precedents set by Ex Parte Milligan and Ex Parte Quirin in the use of military tribunals/commissions in wartime.

Part II

Answer each question separately and number your responses. Each question should be answered in 1 - 2 well-developed paragraphs. Utilize and reference weekly materials in your responses. Reach out via email with any questions.

• Compare the outcomes of Dennis v. US (1951) and Yates v. US (1957).

• One way to look at the Bush Administration's response to the 9/11 attacks is that the administration was mostly concerned with preventing future attacks and bringing Al Qaeda to justice, worrying about law and the Constitution after the fact. What evidence could be provided in support of this position?

The response must include a reference list. One-inch margins, double-space, Using Times New Roman 12 pnt font and APA style of writing and citations.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
History: What historical developments did federal government consider
Reference No:- TGS03203079

Now Priced at $40 (50% Discount)

Recommended (97%)

Rated (4.9/5)