What ethical accountability evident in term of constituents


Problem

This is in regards of "The One Percent" documentary. This documentary focuses on the growing "wealth gap" in America, as seen through the eyes of filmmaker Jamie Johnson, heir to the Johnson & Johnson pharmaceutical fortune. Johnson. He sets his sights on exploring the political, moral and emotional rationale that enables a tiny percentage of Americans - the one percent - to control nearly half the wealth of the entire United States.

YouTube Video: "The One Percent - Documentary".

• What evidence of James Rest's components or stages of moral action from Chapter 6 (Moral Sensitivity/Recognition, Moral Judgment/Reasoning, Moral Focus/Motivation, Moral Character) in any of the behaviors demonstrated in the video? Explain.

• Which of the four decision-making formats from Chapter 6 (Kidder's, Nash's, Lonergan/Baird, Foursquare) do you see being employed by various leaders? How? Were they effective?

• Which leadership styles/theories discussed in Chapter 8 do you see in the documentary? (Transactional, Transformational, Pseudotransformational, Servant, Authentic, Aesthetic, Responsible (CSR), Taoism). Give some examples. How were they ethical/unethical?

• We know some ways leaders foster group accountability from your reading in Chapter 9). What ethical accountability is evident in terms of internal and external constituents? How are the concepts: expectancy, instrumentality, and valence demonstrated (high vs. low - explain). Did you see evidence of emotional intelligence as a way of role modeling and establishing norms? What about groupthink? If so please provide some examples from the film.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: What ethical accountability evident in term of constituents
Reference No:- TGS03255766

Expected delivery within 24 Hours