Was the court of appeal correct in setting aside the jury

Question

Sanders v. American Broadcasting Cos. Supreme Court of California, 20 CAL 4th 907 (1999)

1. Identify the "intrusion on seclusion" in the case.
2. Was the court of appeal correct in setting aside the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff because there must be a complete expectation of privacy to recover for intrusion and other employees could hear the conversation in question?
3. How does the court deal with ABC's argument that an adverse decision would have a chilling effect on the press's investigation of abusive activities in open work areas?