Target Costing Using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Rick's is a popular restaurant for fine dining. The owner and chef, Rick Goetz, is pleased with his success and is now considering expand- ing his existing restaurant or perhaps opening a second restaurant. Before making his decision, Rick wants to find out more about his competitive position. There are three other restaurants that compete directly with him on food quality and price. Rick knows that his profitability depends on his ability to provide a satisfying meal at the market price. His first step is to gather some information about his customers, using an independent market research firm, which informed him that his customers were looking for taste, comfort (the ambiance, service, and overall presentation of the food), and enjoyment (the distinctiveness of the dining experience, a degree of excitement). He was surprised to find that comfort and enjoyment ranked highest.
First: Customer Criteria and Ranking
|
Importance
|
Relative Importance
|
Taste
|
50
|
16.7%
|
Comfort
|
100
|
33.3
|
Enjoyment
|
150
|
50.0
|
Total
|
300
|
100.0%
|
Next, he worked with his key wait staff and chefs to try to identify the three main components, and related cost, of the service Rick's provided:
Second: Components and Cost
Components
|
Cost
|
Percent of Total
|
Menu and Food Preparation
|
$8
|
30.77%
|
Wait Staff
|
12
|
46.15
|
Food Ingredients
|
6
|
23.08
|
Total
|
$26
|
100.00%
|
Having the customer criteria and components, Rick now again worked with his staff to assess how each component contributed to the desired customer criteria.
Third: Determine How Components Contribute to Customer Satisfaction
Components
|
Taste
|
Comfort
|
Enjoyment
|
Menu and Food Preparation
|
30%
|
20%
|
50%
|
Wait Staff
|
40
|
60
|
30
|
Food Ingredients
|
30
|
20
|
20
|
Customer Criteria
|
100%
|
100%
|
100%
|
Required
1. Using the information Rick has developed, determine the importance index for each component (menu and food preparation, wait staff, and food ingredients).
2. Compare your findings in Part 1 to the cost of the components. What conclusions can you draw from this comparison?