The urinary fluoride concentration (parts per million) was measured both for a sample of livestock grazing in an area previously exposed to fluoride pollution and for a similar sample grazing in an unpolluted region
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd8b4/cd8b452443678ce9f5d7ea058805bd646014a774" alt=""
Does the data indicate strongly that the true average fluoride concentration for livestock grazing in the polluted region is larger than for the unpolluted region? Use the Wilcoxon rank-sum test at level α = .01.