The Opinion in “Hudson v. United States” illustrates the application of traditional double jeopardy principles in the context of an administrative proceeding followed by a criminal indictment. The petitioners argued that the criminal indictment on charges of conspiracy, misapplication of bank funds, and making false bank entries were barred by the double jeopardy clause since it “rested on the same lending transactions that formed the basis for the prior administrative actions”. Explain why the Court rejected the petitioners’ argument and provide your opinion as to whether you believe the result in this case was fair