The court's ruling applies only to Greeley's unusual circumstances. How far should the court extend this public policy exception? Are there good reasons for not extending it very far? (Hint: note the opinion in Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation.)
Should the state place a responsibility on businesses to help solve social problems, such as ensuring that divorced fathers make child support payments? If so, are there any limits on the social problems that businesses can be forced by government to address?