Discusses the two schools of thought regarding the purpose of criminal punishment, retribution and prevention. Briefly describe the difference. Which school of thought do you prefer? In your opinion are there certain situations or crimes where the purpose that you do not prefer is more appropriate? If so, give an example.
Decriminalization of marijuana has existed in many states for a while but more recently the legalization of marijuana has passed in some states. There is a lot of discussion about the legalization of marijuana appearing on the ballot in Ohio. What is the difference between decriminalization and legalization? In states where marijuana has been legalized for recreational purposes, the state law conflict with federal law. The Controlled Substance Act, a federal law, doesn't permit marijuana sale and usage. Does legalizing marijuana in states mean that state law trumps federal law? If not, how do states pass these laws? Should federal government be more involved in criminal law? Why? Why not?