The company argued that its no-solicitation rule would have


An employee was discharged for violating the company's no-solicitation rule in its factory and offices. The employee had persisted in soliciting union membership on company property during lunch periods.

The company argued that its no-solicitation rule would have been enforced against not merely union solicitation but any solicitation. How would you decide? Why?

Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB, 324 U.S. 793 (U.S. Sup. Ct.).

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Management Theories: The company argued that its no-solicitation rule would have
Reference No:- TGS02176039

Expected delivery within 24 Hours