The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is:
a. Was it foresseeable to the plaintiff that the defendant would engage in theis conduct?
b. Given this particular injury to the plaintiff, was it foreseeable that the defenant was the cause?
c. should it have been foreseeable to the defendant that the defendant's conduct could lead to this kind of injury?
d. was the injury foreseeable to the plaintiff prior to the injury's occurrence?
e. Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that this kind of injury could occur under the particular conditions that the injury did occur?