Question - The balance per the bank statement on October 31, 2017, was $18,380. Outstanding checks were No. 62 for $140.75, No. 183 for $180, No. 284 for $253.25, No. 862 for $190.71, No. 863 for $226.80, and No. 864 for $165.28. Included with the statement was a credit memorandum of $185 indicating the collection of a note receivable for Daisey Company by the bank on October 25.
This memorandum has not been recorded by Daisey.
The company's ledger showed one Cash account with a balance of $21,877.72. The balance included undepositied cash on hand. Because of the lack of internal controls, Bret took for personal use all of the undeposited receipts in excess of $3,795.51. He then prepared the following bank reconciliation in an effort to conceal his theft of cash:
| Cash balance per books, October 31 |
|
$21,877.72 |
| Add: Outstanding checks |
|
|
| No. 862 |
$190.71 |
|
| No. 863 |
226.80 |
|
| No. 864 |
165.28 |
482.79 |
| |
|
22,360.51 |
| Less: Undeposited receipts |
|
3,795.51 |
| Unadjusted balance per bank, October 31 |
|
18,565.00 |
| Less: Bank credit memorandum |
|
185.00 |
| Cash balance per bank statement, October 31 |
|
$18,380.00 |
Prepare a 1,050-word bank reconciliation report in a Word document that follows APA formatting guidelines (hint: deduct the amount of the theft from the adjusted balance per books) including the following:
- Indicate the three ways that Bret attempted to conceal the theft and the dollar amount involved in each method.
- What principles of internal control were violated in this case?