The accompanying data on y 5 energy output (W) and x = temperature difference (°K) was provided by the authors of the article "Comparison of Energy and Exergy Efficiency for Solar Box and Parabolic Cookers" (J. of Energy Engr., 2007: 53-62). The article's authors fit a cubic regression model to the data. Here is Minitab output from such a fit.conveys information about precision and reliability. Then compare this prediction to the estimate obtained in (c).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6589e/6589eaea0cc501c3b2ad6550dcad87abade104fb" alt=""
a. What proportion of observed variation in energy output can be attributed to the model relationship? b. Fitting a quadratic model to the data results in R2 = .780. Calculate adjusted R2 for this model and compare to adjusted R2 for the cubic model.
c. Does the cubic predictor appear to provide useful information about y over and above that provided by the linear and quadratic predictors? State and test the appropriate hypotheses. d. When x = 30, Sy= .0611. Obtain a 95% CI for true average energy output in this case, and also a 95% PI for a single energy output to be observed when temperature difference is 30.