Question: "Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people's souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person. How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible? Why or why not? "
Things to keep on mind:
1. Evidence of critical thought
2. Evidence of a complete understanding of the relevant theories and concepts
3. Grammar, spelling and length
4. The answer must be 350 Words.
5. No work cited pages or nothing.
6. It's a free writing question so please no plaigiarism
7. Must be an answer of your own.