Question 1: Summarize the majority opinion's supporting its holding that the statute meets the constitutional requirement of reasonableness.
Question 2: Summarize the dissent's arguments that the statute doesn't meet the constitutional requirement of reasonableness.
Question 3: Do you believe that the majority or the dissent or neither has successfully applied the balancing and sorting ideals of criminal procedure to this case? Explain your answer.
Question 4: Compare the facts Nolan possessed with those possessed by Officer McFadden in Terry v. Ohio. In your opinion, which officer had more articulable facts?