Need at a minimum of 600 to 700 words in length defending your response to the given questions:
Problem 1: Strategically, what must Pan-Europa do to keep from becoming the victim of a hostile takeover? What should Pan-Europa do now that they have won the price war? Who should lead the way for Pan-Europa?
Problem 2: Using net present value (NPV), conduct a straight financial analysis of the investment alternatives and rank the projects. Which NPV of the three should be used? Why? Suggest a way to evaluate the effluent project.
Problem 3: What aspects of the projects might invalidate the ranking you just derived? How should we correct for each investments time, value of money, unequal lifetimes, riskiness, and size?
Problem 4: Lastly, reflect on the assignment and come up with a view on the screens and criteria to be used for the project selection process. Apply the criteria and make a project selection.