State position in relation to baboom liability


Assignment task:

Adam bought an electric staple gun manufactured by BaBoom, Inc. He tested it by putting it up against his arm and firing a staple. The staple punctured an artery and Adam suffered severe blood loss. He sued BaBoom, Inc. under products liability law arguing that the staple gun should have carried a warning against using it on skin or flesh. Which of the following most accurately states the position in relation to BaBoom's liability for failing to warn of the danger posed by the staple gun? Adam bought an electric staple gun manufactured by BaBoom, Inc. He tested it by putting it up against his arm and firing a staple. The staple punctured an artery and Adam suffered severe blood loss. He sued BaBoom, Inc. under products liability law arguing that the staple gun should have carried a warning against using it on skin or flesh. Which of the following most accurately states the position in relation to BaBoom's liability for failing to warn of the danger posed by the staple gun? BaBoom, Inc. should have put a warning on the staple gun because the danger it posed was not open and obvious BaBoom, Inc. need not put a warning

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: State position in relation to baboom liability
Reference No:- TGS03404924

Expected delivery within 24 Hours