Some courts, depending on the jurisdiction, will occasionally reform a covenant not to compete. In other words, if the restraints (time restrictions, territory restrictions, scope of activity restrictions) are found to be unreasonably broad, the court may convert the terms into reasonable ones and then enforce the reformed covenant. Do you believe a court should (1) enforce as written, (2) reform and then enforce as reformed, or (3) not enforce an unreasonably broad restrictive covenant? Explain.